The plaintiff byte beating company claimed that both Tencent and its companies are Internet companies providing Internet product services with a direct competitive relationship. Tencent QQ and QQ space are products and services provided by Tencent. Tencent is a well-known Internet company in the industry. Has great influence and control.
The byte beating company discovered that when Internet users share and publish headline web page links through the QQ space operated by Tencent, Tencent uses technical means to intercept and shield users' access to the headline network content and prevent users from accessing the headlines.website. At the same time, Tencent has other unfair competition practices.
The plaintiff byte beating believes that Tencent, as a well-known Internet company with great influence and control in the industry, should adopt fair methods and fair competition with enterprises in the same industry, and should not rely on its own industry's advantages in resources and status. , prevent users from accessing the content of today’s headlines.
The actions of Tencent’s false reminders have seriously derogated and reduced the business reputation and product reputation of today’s headlines. This has caused extremely bad social impact and major economic losses on the headlines today. Tencent’s actions violate the Unfair Competition Law. Relevant regulations.
At present, the case is under further investigation.